Tag Archives: bias

laliberty:

barticles:

Funniest Graph of the Day: In 2006, 73 percent of Democrats said President Bush could do something about gasoline prices. Now only 33 percent think President Obama can do anything about them.

Likewise, in 2006 only 47 percent of Republicans thought Bush could fix gas prices. Now 65 percent of them think Obama can fix them.

Both parties’ rank and file evidently view supply and demand through a partisan filter. Democrats do so more than twice as often (40-point swing vs. 18-point swing) as Republicans.

Obama Apologetics

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why do I turn on the news? They just said Obama beats Romney 50/44, Santorum 53/40, Gingrich 52/37, and then Paul 50/52. First off, that [last total] equals 102%. Secondly, that shows Paul ahead by 2%…

A [justifiably frustrated] Facebook acquaintance, Garrett Jones. (via hipsterlibertarian)

In other news: Entire discipline of mathematics added to the Axis of Evil.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

a-petro-manifesto:
shishkaboo:
macroecon starts today. I wonder how many head desks I’ll do at the retarded keynesian worshiping comments my teacher will spout. but who knows, I might be surprised and find out he hates Keynes and grimaces every time he mentions that hack
Fire any…
That theory headache was why I took graduate-level Mathematical Econ and Econometrics as a freshman (though now I have to go take basic Micro and Macro… Fortunately, at a less leftist school).The professor I had was basically a math professor, so she said all of these brilliant things, without any acknowledgement (or idea, frankly) that they were profoundly controversial. One day, she couldn’t think of an example to use for a technique we were learning and she finally turns to the chalkboard, starts writing and says, in her adorable, quiet Brazilian accent, “okay, so we’re going to use the national income model even though it’s not really true” and just continues without a pause. Loved her. Tiny woman, with no clue about the world outside of abstract mathematical concepts.

Raison et liberte: a-petro-manifesto: shishkaboo: macroecon starts today. I wonder how…

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

At first I thought this was a joke, but then I realized that I’m naive and expect people to have a sense of irony. Like, to realize that posting something about how impartial, informed, and open-minded (that’s a good one) one is while villainizing and blatantly misrepresenting (um, I know a lot of libertarian women who call themselves ‘conservative’ (I don’t, but many do) that are much more attractive than the girl in the ‘liberal’ column and are not criminals that resemble birds).

So let’s go through the bullets, shall we?

Hm, the greater mean education of conservatives tends to disagree with this. Sorry.

Graduate degrees are relatively unimportant and are a very poor financial decision in most cases, unless one is pursuing them for managerial edge or wants to become an academic, which is a highly overrated profession which is extremely politicized, to the chagrin of many well-meaning, intelligent PhDs. Anyway, real skills shouldn’t be discounted. ‘Liberals’ claim to advocate for blue collar workers, right?

I know very few ‘liberals’ that are more informed than I am. Admittedly, the slightly more informed conservatives often have obnoxious sentiments that accompany their facts, but nonetheless, they have a better idea of how many wars we’re in, at the very least. Oh, and I was severely bullied exclusively by liberals, growing up. They refused to revisit their reasons for their beliefs, because they were an overwhelming majority and simply made fun of me. Super tolerant, right? And the Democrats with whom I try to discuss Obama’s extremely poor record with humanitarian issues? They aren’t delusional at all.

Many ‘liberals’ insist that the poor should be put on a fiscal IV for the rest of their lives, with little expectation that their poverty is a minor hiccup that the individuals are intelligent and entrepreneurial enough to solve themselves. That seems pretty disrespectful of others’ dignity to me.

If ‘liberals’ didn’t gather information from biased sources, Rachel Maddow and her ugly haircut wouldn’t have a job. Granted, she might not be as morally repugnant as Ann Coulter, but that’s not saying much.

If I had a penny for every time I heard a ‘liberal’ revert to the morally reprehensible accusation that those that disagree with them ‘want to kill the poor’, ‘hate the poor’, etc., I’d be a fat guy in a baseball cap making documentaries about how much I hate the system from which I’m making loads of money off of.

Before someone reblogs this saying how I’m just angry because I’m conservative: I’m not. I’m a libertarian and I consider myself very liberal and much more concerned with human rights violations, such as war, than most ‘leftists’.

I’m so tired of this obnoxiously one-sided villainizing in which both the right and the left engage. We need to treat others like human beings. Maybe our socialized education system didn’t succeed with the key psychological development goals for kindergarten, but people are capable of being civil to each other, treating others with respect, and above all, realizing that others have different thoughts and experiences which compose their unique mental concepts and perspective on the world. And that is okay. That is great. Judging others and typifying them won’t help anyone; it just contributes to the degradation of civility and justifies treating others as subhuman, which is despicable.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

logicallypositive:
Let’s take this time to educate the reader on logical fallacies. in specific, here’s a great real-life example of the fallacy of the loaded question. First of all, the question from Wolf Blitzer is pretty damn loaded: it has the implication that Ron Paul wants to somehow let people who don’t have…
To be fair, those people claiming that Paul was the one who advocated letting the man die didn’t watch the debate. A good deal of Republicans didn’t watch the debate, so I guarantee you neither did those on the left. It was mainly just us, the libertarians, who are generally ‘over’-informed about the grim state of the world/politics/country. Most people don’t fact-check, so once one leftist with bad intentions posts that claim, the sheep follow (just like they do on the right, without fact-checking). I mainly feel pity for a country of willfully mislead media whores… Then I realize that in their herds, they determine the policies under which I live and I am terrified. On a totally unrelated note, bro: your name has a military of doily keystrokes surrounding it. It’s quite intimidating, yet surprisingly effeminate, making it really, really confusing.

There’s been a lot of stuff going around about Ron Paul supposedly supporting a guy who dies because he can’t afford…

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,